Banner Image
Banner Image
Banner Image
Banner Image
Banner Image
Banner Image
Banner Image
Banner Image
Fishermans Island Banner Image
Banner Image
Port Kembla Banner Image
Banner Image
Banner Image
Banner Image

Awards

Award Date Issue Award
July 2023 The Respondent placed an offer and sold grain online, however they claim they intended to place a bid. PDF icon GTA Arb 373 - Final Award .pdf
Size: 588.58 KB
Updated: 13 November 2023
June 2023 An ex farm contract could not be executed due to road access issues, but which Party was ultimately in default? PDF icon GTA Arb 372 - Final Award.pdf
Size: 1002.31 KB
Updated: 13 November 2023
March 2023 Did the Seller contractually agree to supply the Buyer with additional tonnage either by way of amendment to the First Contract, or as a separate contract? PDF icon GTA Arb 374 - Final Award.pdf
Size: 2.3 MB
Updated: 13 November 2023
February 2023 Was there an agreement to amend the Contract and was the Respondent's Default Notice valid? PDF icon GTA Arb 370 - Final Award.pdf
Size: 2.65 MB
Updated: 13 November 2023
October 2022 Were the delivery instructions invalid as they did not provide 15 calendar days’ notice? PDF icon GTA Arb 368 - Final Award.pdf
Size: 1 MB
Updated: 13 November 2023
March 2022 The Respondent challenged GTA jurisdiction due to alleged non-compliance with Rule 17 of the GTA Trade Rules - Interim award PDF icon GTA Arb 346 - Interim Award.pdf
Size: 673.19 KB
Updated: 7 April 2022
June 2021 The Respondent did not take delivery of grain alleging an underlying agreement that they were not obliged to take the grain if they did not need it. PDF icon GTA Arb 339 - Final Award.pdf
Size: 595.39 KB
Updated: 16 September 2022
June 2021 The Respondent did not wash out the contract upon receiving the Claimant's Notice of Insolvency PDF icon GTA Arb 336 - Final Award.pdf
Size: 827.09 KB
Updated: 24 June 2021
June 2021 The Respondent did not complete execution of the contract after claiming COVID impacted performance, quality issues with delivered grain and allegations of Fraud by Claimant's Agent. PDF icon GTA Arb 335 - Final Award.pdf
Size: 851.62 KB
Updated: 24 June 2021
May 2021 Was the Respondent in repudiatory breach of contract, and was the Claimant entitled to terminate the contract? PDF icon GTA Arb 333 - Final Award.pdf
Size: 1.07 MB
Updated: 13 May 2021

Pages